Authors:
Jonathan Harrington, Speech, Hearing and Language Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney (Australia)
Mary E. Beckman, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (USA)
Janet Fletcher, Department of Linguistics, University of Melbourne, Victoria (Australia)
Sallyanne Palethorpe, Speech, Hearing and Language research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney (Australia)
Page (NA) Paper number 646
Abstract:
This study examines the phonetic characteristics of primary versus
secondary stress on the first syllables of the surname 'Wheateron'
and related adjective 'Wheateresque' in post-nuclear, deaccented position
in a dialogue produced 40 times by 3 Australian English talkers. Synchronised
acoustic, electromagnetometer, and electropalatographic recordings
were analysed. One subject had a higher F0 in the primary stressed
syllable. The other two had a longer acoustic duration for the syllable's
voiced portion, corresponding to a longer lip closing movement. One
of these two also had a larger and faster lip opening movement into
the vowel. Taken together, the results show that primary versus secondary
lexical stress may be differentiated even when accent contrasts are
neutralised, although the differences are inconsistent across talkers
and small by comparison to those that have been shown to characterise
the accented-unaccented contrast.
Authors:
Marija Tabain, Speech, Hearing and Languages Research Centre, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney. (Australia)
Page (NA) Paper number 668
Abstract:
Following a previous study using locus equation (LE) and electropalatographic
(EPG) data to examine coarticulation of voiced consonants and vowels
in CV syllables [1], the present study examines voiceless stops and
fricatives using the same analysis techniques. It is found that when
LE data for stops is sampled at the stop burst, rather than at vowel
onset, the correlation between LE data on coarticulation and EPG data
on coarticulation is quite high. By contrast, results for the fricatives
are quite poor. It is suggested that the LE is capable of capturing
rather gross differences in coarticulatory resistance, such as that
involving a tongue tip rather than a tongue body, but that it is not
capable of capturing more subtle differences in coarticulation, such
as those involving different coronal articulations. This explanation
is supported by work in progress on Australian Aboriginal languages
which have up to four coronal places of articulation [2].
Authors:
Gérard Bailly, Institut de la Communication Parlée (ICP) (France)
Pierre Badin, Institut de la Communication Parlée (ICP) (France)
Anne Vilain, Institut de la Communication Parlée (ICP) (France)
Page (NA) Paper number 66
Abstract:
Linear component articulatory models are built using an iterative subtraction
of linear predictors of the vocal tract geometry. In this paper we
consider the contribution of jaw displacement to tongue and lips movements
using sets of cineradiographic data from three different speakers.
We show that linear prediction overestimates this contribution by capturing
not only the intrinsic mechanical jaw-tongue coupling but also the
synergetic control observed in the corpus. We then propose a subtraction
of the jaw contribution which do not affect the performance of the
model in terms of data prediction.
Authors:
Philip Hoole, Phonetics Institute, Munich University (Germany)
Page (NA) Paper number 1096
Abstract:
The PARAFAC method of factor analysis was used to investigate patterns
of tongue shaping in a corpus of 15 German vowels spoken in 3 consonant
contexts by 7 speakers at 2 speech rates, using data from electromagnetic
articulography. A two-factor model was extracted, giving a succinct,
speaker-independent characterization of the German vowel space and
of some important coarticulatory effects on vowel articulation. Moreover,
the factors appeared to have a plausible physiological substrate. The
PARAFAC model places strong constraints on the form that speaker-specific
effects can take, since speaker differences must be captured in a single
multiplicative weight per speaker and factor. While these constraints
appeared acceptable for modelling vocalic aspects of articulation,
more consonantally-related aspects, such as coarticulatory behaviour
of the tongue-tip, appeared much more difficult to capture in the PARAFAC
framework.
Authors:
Alan A. Wrench, Queen Margaret College (U.K.)
Alan D. McIntosh, Queen Margaret College (U.K.)
Colin Watson, Queen Margaret College (U.K.)
William J. Hardcastle, Queen Margaret (U.K.)
Page (NA) Paper number 1117
Abstract:
In this paper the latest prototype Optopalatograph (OPG) is described
and its operation is demonstrated graphically and in comparison to
theoretical predictions. The system is divided into three parts - the
optopalate itself; a separate self contained unit composed of 16 switched
infra-red light sources, associated control logic and 16 receivers;
and a computer with A/D card running software to analyse and interpret
graphically the sensor outputs. The current prototype measures distances
of up to 20mm between all of the 16 pre-selected points on the hard
palate and the surface of the tongue at a frame rate of 100Hz. We
conclude that the new prototype provides a practical measurement system
with a subjectively informative real-time display but further development
is required in order to obtain objective accuracy.
Authors:
Yohann Meynadier, Laboratoire Parole et Langage, CNRS, ESA 6057 and Institut de Phonetique d'Aix-en-Provence (France)
Michel Pitermann, Department of Psychology, Queen's University of Kingston (Canada)
Alain Marchal, CNRS, DR 19, Caen (France)
Page (NA) Paper number 542
Abstract:
This paper investigates the effects of contrastive focal accent placement
on lingual articulation and coarticulation of French [kskl] clusters
in word-medial position. The EPG results show that (i) this type of
accent does not systematically increase the amplitude, but the duration
of linguopalatal constrictions (particularly their release); (ii) it
directly lengthens the temporal interval between the articulatory hold
phases of two contiguous consonants; (iii) no matter what the accent
position is, it can affect the whole cluster; (iv) the gestural co-ordination
of biconsonant sequences seemed to vary with the focal accent more
according to articulatory than syllable boundary rhythmic constraints.
|