Session T2B Language Specific Speech Analysis

Chairperson John J. Ohala Univ. of California, USA

Home


FACTORS OF VARIATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF THE GERMAN DORSAL FRICATIVE

Authors: B. Pompino-Marschall and Ch. Mooshammer

Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung, Geisteswissenschaftliche Zentren Berlin e.V. . 10/11, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 20 192 419, FAX: +49 30 20 192 402, E-mail: bobby@fas.ag-berlin.mpg.de

Volume 1 pages 375 - 378

ABSTRACT

The articulatory variability of the Standard German (voiceless) dorsal fricative /x/ - surfacing as [c ], [x] or [÷ ] depending on the position within the syllable and the vowel context (cf. [2, 3]) - is analysed by using electropalatographic and electromagnetic articulographic as well as averaged spectral data. The results are compared to those for the coronal fricatives and the velar plosive in German.

A0325.pdf

TOP


EPG AND AERODYNAMIC EVIDENCE FOR THE COPRODUCTION AND COARTICULATION OF CLICKS IN ISIZULU

Authors: Kimberly Thomas

Phonetics Laboratory, Linguistics Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543, USA (e-mail: kimberly@humnet.ucla.edu)

Volume 1 pages 379 - 382

ABSTRACT

This study examines both the nature and relative timing of the component gestures of click consonants in IsiZulu, a Bantu language of the Nguni cluster, spoken in South Africa. Differences between the three click types in the timing and rate of rarefaction reflect coproduction differences between their gestures. Coarticulation with adjacent vowels is illustrated by its effect on the rarefaction rate for the alveolar click type. Results thus far show that multigestural segments can coarticulate with adjacent segments despite claims to the contrary [5].

A0927.pdf

TOP


Formant Trajectory Dynamics in Swabian Diphthongs

Authors: Anja Geumann

Institut für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation, Universität München, Germany E-mail: geumann@phonetik.uni-muenchen.de

Volume 1 pages 383 - 386

ABSTRACT

The vowel quality in some diphthongs of Swabian (an upper german dialect) was determined by measurement of first and second formant values. A minimal contrast could be shown between two different diphthong qualities /Ae/ and /«i/, where for Standard German only one is assumed, viz. /ai/. The two diphthong qualities differ only slightly in onset and offset vowel quality, so a better understanding of their relationship was expected from an examination of their dynamic aspects. Our preliminary results suggest that there is indeed a difference in the temporal structure of the two diphthongs.

A0945.pdf

TOP


THE GESTURAL ORGANIZATION OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS: A CINEFLUOROGRAPHIC STUDY OF ARTICULATOR GESTURES IN GREENLANDIC

Authors: Sidney A. J. Wood

Department of Linguistics, University of Lund, Helgonabacken 12, 22362 LUND, Sweden Tel. +46 46 222 8441, FAX: +46 46 222 4210, E-mail: Sidney.Wood@ling.lu.se

Volume 1 pages 387 - 388

ABSTRACT

This poster presents an analysis of speech articulator movements in Greenlandic speech to test the possible universality of results previously obtained from English, Arabic, Swedish and Bulgarian. Greenlandic is particularly interesting in this context because it is completely unrelated to Indo-European languages and because it offers articulations unfamiliar to speakers of European languages, such as uvular consonants and uvularization of vowels.

A0959.pdf

TOP


THE PERCEPTION OF CORONALS IN WESTERN ARRERNTE

Authors: Victoria B. Anderson

Phonetics Laboratory, Dept of Linguistics, UCLA, CA 90095 USA Institute for Aboriginal Development, Alice Springs, NT 0870 Australia victoria@humnet.ucla.edu; (310) 206-2808

Volume 1 pages 389 - 392

ABSTRACT

This study examined perception of multiple coronal places of articulation by native listeners of Western Arrernte. Three main findings emerged. 1) Coronal nasals and laterals are as perceptually robust as coronal stops. 2) Across manners of articulation, apical alveolars are less perceptually robust than other coronals. 3) Formant transitions from a preceding vowel are necessary to correctly identify apical alveolars and apical postalveolars. Acoustic analysis shows the importance of cues on the preceding vowel side for apical postalveolars, and on the following vowel side for laminal palatoalveolars. Laminal dentals have statistically distinguishable cues on both sides of the segment. Apical alveolars are hardest to characterize acoustically, and may be perceived by default. Low perceptibility of apical alveolars may be a reason for low functional load of the apical contrast. Result 3 corroborates Steriade's idea that contrasts "must be licensed by the presence of their cues." [4]

A1046.pdf

TOP


ACOUSTIC MODELLING OF AMERICAN ENGLISH /r/

Authors: Carol Y. Espy-Wilson (1),(5) , Shrikanth Narayanan (2), Suzanne E. Boyce (1),(3),(5) & Abeer Alwan (4)

(l)Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 (2)AT&T Labs, Murray Hill, NJ (3)Dept. of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati (4)Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles (5)Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology E-mail: espy@formant.bu.edu, shri@research.att.com,boyce@formant.bu.edu, alwan@icsl.ucla.edu

Volume 1 pages 393 - 396

ABSTRACT

The low F3 of American English /r/ (typical range 1300-1900 Hz) is accompanied articulatorily by constrictions in the pharyngeal, palatal and labial regions. Because acoustical theory predicts that formants will lower at points of maximum volume velocity in the vocal tract, and because such points occur in the pharyngeal, palatal and labial regions, many investigators have speculated that the combination of these constrictions accounts for the low F3 of /r/. In this paper, we use the Maeda vocal tract modelling software to compare theoretical predictions of constriction location to data gathered from two American English speakers via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). We conclude that additional mechanisms are required to explain the acoustics of American English /r/.

A1202.pdf

TOP